|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
I saw this a few weeks ago and couldn't believe it. It was one of the funniest things I've seen on a forum in a while. Worth checking out!
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
lol! Took me an age to read but was worth it
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you for putting a link to that now world famous thread. It took me a little over 2 hours, but I read every post. I am amazed to how many other music bulletin boards have links to that one thread! It really is historical. . . and hysterical!
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
hehe, thanks ... i am still reading it and it is really hillarious:
especially this part: "Recording two takes is too time consuming and can produce somewhat undefined results. Doubling tracks and delaying is too sloppy. Sorry, but personally I would never use either of those methods." this guy don't want to work with all the good stuff and tricks (or usual processes which have been used for ages to get a phatter sound) ... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|